Article - When Exiled Communities Act

The invitation by the Palestinian community in Germany to speak at their events on the solemn occasion of Land Day (March 30) was, at a personal level, filled with significance and emotion. Prior to the event, I had had many questions about the extent to which this – and by extension other – exiled community was concerned about and engaged with the Palestinian cause.

What I found in the small city Dortmund (pop. 600,000) were hundreds of Palestinians families of all ages that had traveled many miles to commemorate the occasion. All the political parties and factions were also represented. Banners and keffiyehs were raised and loudspeakers blasted the voice of Fairouz, songs of the revolution, and the sounds of Palestinian folklore. Young men and women spontaneously danced the Palestinian dabke, and photographs, embroidery, and paintings hung on the walls, depicting the historic cities of Palestine and the various episodes in the people’s struggle and lives.

Even the children – the fourth generation of Nakba survivors – cloaked themselves with keffiyehs and flags, unmistakable symbols of resistance and of a determination to hold on to land and rights regardless of the passage of time. Their very presence signaled a defeat of the Zionist movement’s founding fathers maxim that the “old will die and the young will forget,” as Israel’s first Prime Minister David Ben Gurion put it.

That the community was engaged in Palestinian current affairs was clear from the many questions and comments they asked me about interviews I had given to the BBC or Al Jazeera, or weekly columns I had written, both recently or many years earlier. Every time a speaker mentioned the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), or a Fatah, Hamas, Popular Front or Democratic Front martyr, the hall resounded with clapping and applause. I sensed that all were longing for the reawakening of their national movement, that they missed the PLO, their sole legitimate representative, and fervently wanted the reconciliation process to succeed.

In my presentation, I spoke of current Palestinian realities in light of the collapse of the option for negotiations and the limited horizons for peace. We discussed the need for the rebirth of the PLO and the revival of the Palestinian national movement. It was an opportunity to address the pivotal role Palestinian communities in exile have to play in pushing for reconciliation as well as the reconstruction, restructuring, and reactivation of the PLO.

It is worth recalling that, during the Cairo dialogues and agreements around reconciliation, the Palestinian leadership – Fatah, Hamas, and all other parties – reached a consensus on the need to revive and democratize the PLO, beginning with the Palestine National Council (PNC). It was agreed that the PNC must not be shaped by “appointments” and “quotas” for political parties, but rather constituted anew through voting and ballot boxes. Alas, nothing has happened so far to implement these decisions, not because the reconciliation process has been derailed so often, but because there is no seriousness in dealing with this issue. It is as if the promises were made simply to appease the people and to appear in tune with the changes brought about by the so-called Arab Spring.

So far, no one has visited the Palestinian communities abroad and nobody has accurately mapped their distribution and numbers. There are no electoral registers, and we know nothing of the potential electorate. I even heard a discussion by local activists about the exact size of the Palestinian community in Germany, with numbers ranging from 75,000 to 250,000!

If the Palestinian political parties are really serious about their commitment to democracy, they should survey the size of Palestinian communities, map their geographic distribution, prepare electoral registers, and register voters under the oversight of an impartial and fair body around which there is consensus. Such a process would undoubtedly take many months, and yet there are those who repeatedly insist – without careful consideration – that we need PNC elections within three months of the establishment of the reconciliation government.

As I spoke to the Palestinian community in Germany, I insisted that we must prepare for elections. The Palestinian communities themselves should begin to coordinate and to undertake survey and registration activities. I briefed the community about an initiative that Palestinian activists are already carrying out under the slogan “Register! I am Palestinian” (the PNC Registration Campaign www.pncregcampaign.org) so that Palestinians can practice their rights as citizens to select their PNC representative in a free and transparent manner.

All of the people I spoke to showed a surprising level of interest in this idea and acceptance of it, something that I believe is happening in other countries. This deserves full encouragement from the leaderships of the PLO, the Palestinian Authority, Hamas, and all Palestinian parties, as well as independents. In the absence of this community-led process, and without providing every Palestinian citizen 18 years or older with a chance to vote, all this talk of PNC elections is merely ink on paper, a night mist that evaporates in the morning sun.

Oraib Rantawi is the founder and director general of the Amman-based Al Quds Center for Political Studies and an established writer and columnist. He has...
(2012, May 28)

Latest Analysis

 Politics
On November 17, 2025, the UN Security Council passed Resolution 2803 endorsing US President Donald Trump’s twenty-point plan for Gaza. The vote, pushed through after weeks of US pressure, establishes two supposedly “transitional” bodies to take control of Gaza: a Board of Peace tasked with overseeing aid delivery, reconstruction, and day-to-day administration, and an International Stabilization Force to take over security and disarm Hamas. Notably, the resolution does not refer to the genocide of the past two years, nor does it address accountability for it. Instead, this policy memo shows how the resolution repackages colonial control over the Palestinian people in Gaza, rewards the US—a co-perpetrator of genocide—with control over Gaza and its potentially lucrative reconstruction process, while simultaneously relieving the Israeli regime of all of its responsibilities as an illegally occupying power. Rather than advancing justice, the UN has once again undermined its own legal principles under US pressure.
Al-Shabaka Yara Hawari
Yara Hawari· Nov 20, 2025
 Refugees
Lebanese officials have revived calls to disarm Palestinian factions inside refugee camps, presenting it as part of efforts to curb “illicit weapons” and reinforce state sovereignty. Yet for many Palestinians and regional observers, the refugee-camp disarmament initiative signifies an attempt to recalibrate the region’s security landscape. It also revives traumatic collective memories of earlier disarmament campaigns that left camps exposed to massacres. 
 Economics
US tech giants portray themselves as architects of a better world powered by artificial intelligence (AI), cloud computing, and data-driven solutions. Under slogans like “AI for Good,” they promise ethical innovation and social progress. Yet in Gaza, these narratives have collapsed, alongside international norms and what remains of the so-called rules-based order. Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza has highlighted the role of major technology companies in enabling military operations and sustaining the occupation. Beneath the destruction lie servers, neural networks, and software built by some of the world’s most powerful corporations. As Israel weaponizes AI and data analytics to kill Palestinians and destroy their homes, the militarization of digital technologies and infrastructures is redefining accountability and exposing a governance vacuum. This policy brief traces how corporate complicity now extends to war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide—and calls for urgent regulation of AI militarization.
Al-Shabaka Marwa Fatafta
Marwa Fatafta· Oct 26, 2025