A Palestinian money changer counts money at an currency exchange office

Introduction

Israel’s withholding of Palestinian clearance revenues is a longstanding practice, historically used to punish or manipulate the Palestinian Authority (PA). Since October 2023, the Israeli regime has only escalated its theft of Palestinian funds, bringing the PA to the verge of financial collapse. This policy memo argues that Israel’s weaponization of clearance revenues is not merely an extension of past measures but a reflection of a new, more radical agenda driven by the far-right. While the international community continues to play a moderating role, the memo argues that long-term prospects for the PA and the Palestinian economy remain deeply uncertain as Israel tightens its grip on key financial levers.1

Background

Clearance revenues refer to the taxes collected by Israel on behalf of the PA. These taxes include tariffs, purchase taxes, and VAT on imports from Israel and the rest of the world. About 99% of clearance revenues come from these sources, while the remaining 1% comes from income taxes paid by Palestinians working in 1948. Since 1994, the Paris Protocol has dictated the terms under which Israel collects and transfers this revenue, entrenching Israel’s significant control over Palestinian fiscal resources.

This arrangement has allowed Israel to suspend or deduct funds as it deems fit. Indeed, Israel has suspended the transfer of Palestinian taxes multiple times since this scheme was first developed, including during the Second Intifada, in 2006 following Hamas’ victory in legislative elections, in December 2012 in response to Palestine securing an upgraded status in the UN, and in 2015 after Palestine accepted the jurisdiction of the ICC over crimes committed in the West Bank and Gaza. Since 2019, Israel has also deducted sums equivalent to the payments made by the Palestinian government to the families of Palestinian prisoners and those martyred. These deductions totaled 3.54 billion NIS—just under $1 billion—between February 2019 and July 2024, amounting to 5% of the 2023 Palestinian GDP.

Escalation of Revenue Withholdings Post-October 2023

The situation worsened further in October 2023, when Israel began withholding an additional $75 million per month—equivalent to the salaries paid by the PA to civil servants in Gaza. Since then, these new withholdings have totaled more than $750 million. Moreover, Israel has also refused to transfer revenues from the departure tax on the Jordan crossings, which have accumulated over the years and exceeded $238 million. As a result, the total deductions amount to approximately $1.23 billion—nearly half of the PA’s clearance revenues.

Israel’s current approach toward withholding funds from the PA…suggests a strategic shift to undermine the PA itself Share on X

The suspension of funds has exacerbated the PA’s financial crisis, leading to significant delays in public servants’ salaries. When eventually paid, public employees receive only 70-80% of their earnings, while the remaining 30% accumulate as arrears. The long-term debt to local banks has increased from $1.04 billion in October 2023 to $1.59 billion in July 2024, while the debt to local institutions has risen from $50.5 million to $95 million during the same period. Israel’s withholding of nearly $2 billion in funds, the loss of income from Palestinian workers in Israel, and tightened movement restrictions have collectively contributed to a substantial increase in unemployment, from 12% to 32%, as well as rising poverty and food insecurity levels in the West Bank. This has also led to a 25% decrease in GDP, painting a grim picture of the PA’s financial health.

A New Strategic Goal: Eradicating the PA

Israel’s current approach toward withholding or deducting funds from the PA marks a significant departure from its previous containment strategy. While similar actions in the past have been used to punish or exert pressure on the PA, the magnitude of the current withholdings suggests a strategic shift to undermine the PA itself. Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has stated this aim explicitly for years, calling for an end to the PA and “unification” of the West Bank and Israel. Concurrent with these revenue withholdings, Israel has likewise barred Palestinian laborers from working within the 1948 borders, approved the largest West Bank land grab in 30 years, and carried out the most significant military assault on the West Bank in two decades. 

Accordingly, the Israeli regime is no longer concerned with maintaining the status quo or using economic incentives to control the population. Instead, its aim is clearly to dismantle the PA and assert complete control over Palestinian life, leaving no room for any form of Palestinian governance or autonomy. As a result, there has been a marked decline in Palestinian economic activity, worsening living conditions, and increased insecurity among Palestinians in the West Bank.

The PA may be able to endure the current level of Israeli deductions from clearance revenues through increased borrowing and mobilizing international support. However, a complete suspension of transferring clearance revenues and cutting of banking relations between Israeli and Palestinian banks would likely precipitate the collapse of the PA. While pressure from the US and other international players have managed so far to persuade Israel to avoid these steps, the PA’s potential collapse is a stark reality that cannot be ignored.

  1. To read this piece in French, please click here. Al-Shabaka is grateful for the efforts by human rights advocates to translate its pieces, but is not responsible for any change in meaning.
Ismat Quzmar is an economic researcher based in Ramallah, Palestine. He is currently the External Relations Officer at the Palestine Economic Policy Research Institute (MAS)...
(2024, December 1)

Latest Analysis

 Politics
The erasure of Indigenous populations lies at the core of settler-colonial narratives. These narratives aim to deny existing geographies, communities, and histories to justify the displacement and replacement of one people by another. The Zionist project is no exception. Among Zionism’s founding myths is the claim that it “made the desert bloom” and that Tel Aviv, its crown jewel, arose from barren sand dunes—an uninhabitable void transformed by pioneering settlers. This framing obscures the fact that the colonial regime initially built Tel Aviv on the outskirts of Yaffa (Jaffa), a thriving Palestinian city with a rich cultural life and a booming orange trade. The “dunes” description projects emptiness and conceals the vibrant agricultural and social life that flourished in the area. By casting the land as uninhabitable until redeemed by settlers, this narrative helped justify dispossession and colonial expansion. This process intensified after 1948, when Tel Aviv absorbed the lands of ethnically cleansed Palestinian villages, including al-Sumayil, Salame, Shaykh Muwannis, and Abu Kabir, and ultimately extended into the city of Yaffa. This same settler-colonial discourse drives the ongoing genocidal war on Gaza, where destruction is reframed through the narrative of “uninhabitability.” Gaza is increasingly depicted as a lifeless ruin—a framing that is far from neutral. This commentary contends that “uninhabitable” is a politically charged term that masks culpability, reproduces colonial erasure, and shapes policy and public perception in ways that profoundly affect Palestinian lives and futures. It examines the origins, function, and implications of this discourse within the logic of settler colonialism, calling for a radical shift in language from narratives that obscure violence to those affirming Palestinian presence, history, and sovereignty.
Abdalrahman Kittana· Aug 27, 2025
 Politics
Since October 2023, Israel’s assault on Gaza has produced one of the most catastrophic humanitarian crises in recent history—an unfolding genocide enabled by world powers and continuing unabated despite the sweeping global solidarity it has sparked. Alongside relentless bombardment and mass displacement, the Israeli regime is waging a deliberate campaign of starvation. In response to this Israeli-manufactured catastrophe, several European states have begun recognizing or signaling their intent to recognize the State of Palestine. Most recently, France announced its intention to recognize a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September. The UK has stated it will follow suit unless Israel abides by a ceasefire and recommits to a two-state solution. The recent wave of symbolic recognitions that began in 2024 now appears to be the only step many European powers are willing to take in the face of genocide, following nearly two years of moral, material, and diplomatic support for the Israeli regime as well as near-total impunity. This roundtable conversation with Al Shabaka policy analysts Diana Buttu, Inès Abdel Razek, and Al Shabaka’s co-director, Yara Hawari, asks: Why now? What political or strategic interests are driving this wave of recognition? And what does it mean to recognize a Palestinian state, on paper, while leaving intact the structures of occupation, apartheid, and the genocidal regime that sustains them?
 Politics
In March, Israel shattered the ceasefire in Gaza by resuming its bombing campaign at full force and enforcing a total blockade on humanitarian aid—ushering in a new phase of the ongoing genocide. In response to mounting international criticism, the Israeli regime introduced a tightly controlled aid scheme designed not to alleviate suffering, but to obscure its use of starvation as a weapon of collective punishment. Through the so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), Israel has transformed humanitarian aid into a tool of control, coercion, and forced displacement. Israeli forces have additionally blocked UN and other aid agencies from accessing over 400 distribution points they once operated throughout Gaza. They consequently forced two million Palestinians to rely on just four GHF sites, most near its southern border in what appears to be a deliberate effort to push mass displacement toward Egypt. Investigations have also revealed how US-based private contractors are actively profiting from the GHF’s deadly operations. In this policy lab, Yara Asi and Alex Feagans join host Tariq Kenney-Shawa to discuss how the GHF fits into Israel’s genocidal strategy—and to expose the network of individuals and companies profiting from what has been a death trap masquerading as humanitarian assistance.
Skip to content