Focus On: Palestinian-Israeli Security Coordination

The Palestine Liberation Organization’s top leadership body, the Central Council, called for a halt to Palestinian security coordination with Israel in 2015. Yet PLO Chair Mahmoud Abbas has described it as sacred despite the breakdown of the peace process to end Israel’s 50-year military occupation and colonization of Palestinian territory. The killing by Israeli forces of activist and youth leader Basil Al-Araj, whom the Palestinian Authority had previously imprisoned – raising accusations that his jailing was part of its so-called revolving door policy – has refocused public attention on the issue. In the selection of pieces below, Al-Shabaka policy analysts discuss the origins and pillars of Israeli-PA security coordination as well as its consequences for the Palestinian people, who experience it as an additional layer of oppression to the multiple violations of their rights under occupation, within Israel, and in exile. 

The Context and Evolution of Security Coordination

The Evolution and Reform of Palestinian Security Forces 1993-2013

By Alaa Tartir

Writing in Stability: International Journal of Security & Development, Al-Shabaka’s program director Alaa Tartir provides a contextual analysis of the evolution and reform processes of Palestinian security forces over the last two decades. Read more

After Gaza, What Price Palestine’s Security Sector?

By Sabrien Amrov and Alaa Tartir

In this Al-Shabaka policy brief, Tartir and Al-Shabaka Policy Analyst Sabrien Amrov urge reform of a donor-driven sector that only serves Israel’s colonial ambitions. They examine the sector’s origins and its current machinations, and how the PA’s fast-growing authoritarianism is turning “Palestine” into a security state. Read more…

The Beginning of the End of Palestinian Security Coordination with Israel?

By Tariq Dana

In a piece for Jadaliyya, Al-Shabaka Policy Analyst Tariq Dana argues that the Palestinian security sector in its current form is far from being part of a national project that would serve the Palestinian cause. Instead, he writes, it serves the PA elite in that it ensures their safety, protects their wealth, and suppresses political opposition. Read more…  

Palestinian Sovereignty: Between International Recognition and Security Coordination

By Sabrien Amrov

Amrov’s op-ed for Middle East Monitor argues that “reproducing a security paradigm which filters out the concerns of Palestinians and their right to security is effectively attempting to write-off Palestinians from their own sovereignty.” Read more

How US Security Aid to PA Sustains Israel’s Occupation

By Alaa Tartir

Tartir’s analysis for Al-Jazeera is based on little-known statistics that quantify the aid-reliant PA security sector, including the fact that half of Palestinian public sector civil servants are employed in security. Annually, the sector receives $1bn from the PA’s budget and around 30 percent of total international aid. Read more…

Repression, Authoritarianism, and Criminalizing Resistance

Subcontracting Repression in the West Bank and Gaza

By Sabrien Amrov and Alaa Tartir

In a New York Times op-ed, Amrov and Tartir ask: “To what end do the international donors continue to subsidize an agency that helps to perpetuate the Israeli occupation, fails to meet the needs of Palestinian civilians, and violates the very human rights norms they claim to uphold?” Read more…

Israeli-Palestinian Security Collaboration Called into Question

By Tariq Dana

Dana’s op-ed for The Hill argues that the priorities of the Palestinian security forces, originally set up under the 1993 peace process, took a sharp turn with the death of Yasser Arafat, the election of Abbas, and the subsequent split between Hamas and Fatah. Read more…

Securitized Development and Palestinian Authoritarianism under Fayyadism

By Alaa Tartir

Tartir analyzes perceptions of the PA’s post-2007 state-building project in the journal Conflict, Security & Development, drawing on the findings of ethnographic fieldwork conducted at Balata and Jenin refugee camps. Many of those he spoke to described the detrimental effect of Fayyadism on their resistance against Israel’s occupation as well as their own protection and security. Read more…

Criminalizing Resistance: The Cases of Balata and Jenin Refugee Camps

By Alaa Tartir

Tartir’s forthcoming article in the Journal of Palestine Studies argues that conducting security reform to ensure stability within the context of colonial occupation and without addressing the imbalances of power can only have two outcomes: “better” collaboration with the occupying power, and a violation of Palestinians’ security and national rights by their own security forces. 

Keeping Yourself Occupied: The Palestinian Authority Guide

Produced by Visualizing Palestine

This infographic by Al-Shabaka partner Visualizing Palestine highlights the PA’s complicity in sustaining Israel’s military occupation. Read more…

Al-Shabaka’s Tariq Dana, Sabrien Amrov, and Alaa Tartir are available for media interviews. Please email contact@al-shabaka for more details.  

Tariq Dana is Assistant Professor of Conflict and Humanitarian Studies at the Doha Institute for Graduate Studies, and an adjunct lecturer at Northwestern University in...
Al-Shabaka Policy Member Sabrien Amrov is pursuing her Ph.D. in Human Geography at the University of Toronto. In 2013, she earned her master’s degree in...
Alaa Tartir is Al-Shabaka's program and policy advisor. He is a senior researcher and director of the Middle East and North Africa Programme at Stockholm International...

Latest Analysis

 Politics
“We’re all going to end up in Jordan,” remarked a young man from Al-Jiftlik, a Palestinian village in the Jordan Valley. His comment reflects growing despair in the West Bank countryside, where Israeli settler-colonial expansion has intensified to unprecedented levels. This is particularly true in the Jordan Valley, the agricultural heartland along the West Bank’s eastern frontier with Jordan. Once known among Palestinians as the “bride of the Jordan Valley,” Al-Jiftlik now illustrates the gravity of Israeli state-sponsored settler expansion on Palestinian land, having transformed from a prosperous agricultural community into one under siege and facing sustained displacement pressure. Since the beginning of Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza in October 2023, land seizure in the West Bank has shifted from creeping settler encroachment to a vicious military-backed campaign of territorial theft. This commentary shows how the Israeli regime’s land appropriation policy in the West Bank, once justified through bureaucratic-legal land seizure orders, has now increasingly shifted toward direct settler takeovers. This shift does not indicate a change in objectives but rather an escalation of existing settlement expansion mechanisms, signaling the growing power and influence of the settler movement over Israeli policy.
Al-Shabaka Fathi Nimer
Fathi Nimer· Feb 3, 2026
 Politics
The announcement of the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza (NCAG), a 15-member technocratic body chaired by Ali Shaath, signals a shift toward depoliticized governance in Gaza amid ongoing genocide. Shaath, a Palestinian civil engineer and former deputy minister of planning and international cooperation, will lead an interim governing structure tasked with managing reconstruction and service provision under external oversight. While presented as a neutral technocratic governing structure, the NCAG is more likely to function as a managerial apparatus that stabilizes conditions that enable genocide rather than challenging them. This policy memo argues that technocratic governance in Gaza—particularly under US oversight, given its role as a co-perpetrator in the genocide—should be understood not as a pathway to recovery or sovereignty, but as part of a broader strategy of genocide management.
Al-Shabaka Yara Hawari
Yara Hawari· Jan 26, 2026
 Civil Society
This policy brief introduces de-healthification as a framework for understanding Israel’s systematic destruction of Palestinian healthcare infrastructure, particularly in Gaza. Rather than viewing the collapse of Gaza’s health system as a secondary outcome of the genocide, the brief argues that it is the product of long-standing policies of blockade, occupation, and structural neglect intended to render Palestinian life unhealable and perishable. By tracing the historical evolution of de-healthification, this brief argues that naming the process is essential for accountability. Because intent is revealed through patterns of destruction rather than explicit declarations, the framework of de-healthification equips policymakers, legal bodies, and advocates to identify healthcare destruction and denial as a core mechanism of settler-colonial control.
Layth Malhis· Jan 11, 2026